Takes Two To Tango
The one who doesn't fall, doesn't stand up.
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 34,970
- Reaction score
- 47,192
- Sep 2, 2023
- #1
I'm talking about everything from skill to boxing career. To whatever else criteria you want to put. Just who's better boxer overall in your opinion?
Just love to see what the numbers will be like on here. Thank you.
Sivo The Ram
Silver Belt
@Silver
- Joined
- May 4, 2012
- Messages
- 12,107
- Reaction score
- 8,110
- Sep 2, 2023
- #2
it's floyd. Roy himself wouldn't consider himself the better boxer
H
Heelhook71
Purple Belt
@purple
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 232
- Sep 2, 2023
- #3
Roy was the more athletically gifted creative boxer but the reason his form went off a cliff after he got older was because his fundamentals weren’t amazing.
Seano
Hands of bone
@plutonium
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 135,391
- Reaction score
- 36,183
- Sep 2, 2023
- #4
Floyd by a mile.
Roy was more about athleticism and physical gifts.
StopDucking
Brown Belt
@Brown
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 4,368
- Reaction score
- 2,868
- Sep 2, 2023
- #5
Dumbest thread of the year so far.
Takes Two To Tango
The one who doesn't fall, doesn't stand up.
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 34,970
- Reaction score
- 47,192
- Sep 2, 2023
- #6
StopDucking said:
Dumbest thread of the year so far.
Thank you.
Stormtrooper85
Silver Belt
@Silver
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
- Messages
- 10,163
- Reaction score
- 7,827
- Sep 2, 2023
- #7
Bob Sapp
zapataxiv
Gold Belt
@Gold
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,392
- Reaction score
- 12,412
- Sep 2, 2023
- #8
StopDucking said:
Dumbest thread of the year so far.
did you miss Crawford vs SRR skill vs skill thread?
ComfortablyNumb55
Brown Belt
@Brown
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2022
- Messages
- 4,727
- Reaction score
- 8,888
- Sep 2, 2023
- #9
Roy looked super cool.
So he must be the GOAT.
defjaam
Brown Belt
@Brown
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 3,333
- Sep 2, 2023
- #10
Both were decent boxers on national level, but nowhere close to Tyrone Spong.
mozfonky
We oughta be fightin' a bottle of Geritol.
@Gold
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Messages
- 23,609
- Reaction score
- 8,918
- Sep 2, 2023
- #11
who'd beat who on their best day in a pfp mythic match? Roy, that's who and it would be easy for him.
Kovalev's "Man Bag"
Threat Actor
@Gold
- Joined
- May 12, 2016
- Messages
- 15,979
- Reaction score
- 13,019
- Sep 2, 2023
- #12
mozfonky said:
who'd beat who on their best day in a pfp mythic match? Roy, that's who and it would be easy for him.
This. No question.
borntoloseNOT
Red Belt
@red
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2004
- Messages
- 8,813
- Reaction score
- 4,985
- Sep 2, 2023
- #13
mozfonky said:
who'd beat who on their best day in a pfp mythic match? Roy, that's who and it would be easy for him.
Exactly, Floyd was the better TECHNICIAN and resume, but Roy would have boxed his ears off.
Blue_Ribbon
Orange Belt
@Orange
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2023
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 369
- Sep 2, 2023
- #14
Floyd has stellar fundamentals.
Roy was gifted physically.
mozfonky
We oughta be fightin' a bottle of Geritol.
@Gold
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Messages
- 23,609
- Reaction score
- 8,918
- Sep 3, 2023
- #15
Someone here quoted a fighter who claimed to spar both and he said Roy was faster even though he was a lot bigger. Forget who the fighter was. Roy had killer power at Middleweight and he kayoed or put down guys who didn't have a history of being put down or kayoed. He threw volleys of punches when he had a guy hurt, 30-40 punches and kayo written on most of them. Floyd wasn't a killer puncher so Roy's chin wouldn't factor and Roy was a great strategist. Floyd had a rock solid chin from what I could see so Roy probably wouldn't put him away but he'd outpoint him. The other thing, Floyd was conservative most of the time, he's not beating Roy like that.
StopDucking
Brown Belt
@Brown
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 4,368
- Reaction score
- 2,868
- Sep 3, 2023
- #16
mozfonky said:
who'd beat who on their best day in a pfp mythic match? Roy, that's who and it would be easy for him.
Luckily for Floyd, he's on his best day 7 days a week whereas Roy is only on his best day 4 days a week. The rest of the week, Roy's likelihood of beating someone in the top 10 of his weightclass is around 30%.
mozfonky
We oughta be fightin' a bottle of Geritol.
@Gold
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Messages
- 23,609
- Reaction score
- 8,918
- Sep 3, 2023
- #17
StopDucking said:
Luckily for Floyd, he's on his best day 7 days a week whereas Roy is only on his best day 4 days a week. The rest of the week, Roy's likelihood of beating someone in the top 10 of his weightclass is around 30%.
Both were highly disciplined, no problem with their conditioning, they are about equal there and better than most champions in terms of not getting slovenly in training. Roy at his best was pure domination. He's a guy who went years without losing more than a few rounds.
borntoloseNOT
Red Belt
@red
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2004
- Messages
- 8,813
- Reaction score
- 4,985
- Sep 3, 2023
- #18
mozfonky said:
Someone here quoted a fighter who claimed to spar both and he said Roy was faster even though he was a lot bigger. Forget who the fighter was. Roy had killer power at Middleweight and he kayoed or put down guys who didn't have a history of being put down or kayoed. He threw volleys of punches when he had a guy hurt, 30-40 punches and kayo written on most of them. Floyd wasn't a killer puncher so Roy's chin wouldn't factor and Roy was a great strategist. Floyd had a rock solid chin from what I could see so Roy probably wouldn't put him away but he'd outpoint him. The other thing, Floyd was conservative most of the time, he's not beating Roy like that.
Honestly Roy had the more perceptive eyes and IQ too. Floyd knew the game inside and out, raised with it and disciplined, but Roy inherited it in his DNA with godgiftedness, and exhibited genius in real time like some pugilistic god. And I’m a big Floyd fan, but if unorthodox methods were difficultly for his very studied methods of defense and counters, then Roy would have made him look absolutely ridiculous.
When you compare both prime guys in the whole package sense you gotta consider that Roy was the better boxer. I absolutely agree Floyd was the better technique guy in the traditional sense, sure… but think about it, Roy would lead the exchanges, counter counters, land unorthodox combinations, win the footwork battle, do things Floyd could never prepare for aka improvise something new in real time, he could time Floyd and was faster too. I mean how does any of that make Floyd the better boxer? Hehe, but it’s all make believe what if’s anyway
KillerIsBack V2
Silver Belt
@Silver
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2015
- Messages
- 10,756
- Reaction score
- 5,350
- Sep 3, 2023
- #19
Pretty boy has the TBE smile P4P
Money has goat hair implanted on his chin.
listrahtes
Red Belt
@red
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2015
- Messages
- 9,192
- Reaction score
- 4,808
- Sep 3, 2023
- #20
At their best in their primes Roy is more than a league above Floyd . Its really no question. He was able to ridicule worldclass elite boxers and his feat of going up to HW defeating, while not the best, but a legitimate HW champ in Ruiz was outstanding.
Floyd even in his prime was a hometown fighter often coasting because he knew that he would get the win on points. Still worldclass but with Roy that was never even close to necessary. Career in general Floyd takes it as his is much longer and he depended less on reflexes and speed.
RJJ is underapreciated nowadays. The best p4p boxer of the last decades out of the US.
You must log in or register to reply here.